Need help with data driven category

Started by ben, March 19, 2015, 10:35:57 PM

Previous topic - Next topic

ben

Hi @all,

i am having trouble with a data driven category, when using the option "detect hierarchies".

Level 1:
   Tag: XMP::iptcCore\CountryCode\CountryCode\0
   Use other element = No
   "Rest" = default
   
Level 2:
   Tag: photools.com::IMatch\101400\file.foldername\0
   Use other element = No
   Detect hierarchie = Yes / No          -> see cases below
   Separators: "\"
   "Rest" = default   

Case 1 - OK:
   Detect hierarchie = No
   -> i get a tree structure, where all files are contained, that have the tag CountryCode not empty -> 10x
   
Case 2 - NOK?!
   Detect hierarchie = Yes
   -> i get a tree structure with ~13.000 elements   
   -> why are there images included that have no CountryCode set?
   
   
Thanks for any help,

Ben
   

Mario

I actually had to re-create this and to think about it for a while to figure out a) what you did and b) if IMatch is right. IMatch is right.

When you split folders into hierarchies in a data-driven category (which is unusual, all by itself) the top-node becomes the drive (e.g. c:). Below that, all folders from drive C: are added as child categories because of your split folder into hierarchy. And when IMatch determines if it must add "c:" below the country "USA" it checks if at least one file in "USA" is also contained on "C:". If this is the case, "C:" is added, and naturally all it's child categories, recursively.

I'm not sure if you can achieve what you probably are trying to do this way.

ben

QuoteI'm not sure if you can achieve what you probably are trying to do this way.

What i am trying to do is...

"At the end, i want a subset of my database to be synchronized to a linux device which can be accessed by FTP.
I want a very comfortable way for selecting this subset in iMatch."


So, i was thinking of creating a collection (data-driven based on a specific keyword is only one possibility)
and then use an iMatch script to sync it to the other device.

If i create this collection, using the same tree structure as the folder structure itself, then it is also
pretty easy to get a quick overview, which images are in this subset collection. That's why i tried this data-driven category
with splitted folders.

Mario, do you have some other suggestions?

Thanks for any help.
ben